GI- Registration trends in india

The Department of Industrial Promotion and Policy (DIPP) the policy making and administration body for various Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), has been introducing lot of measures to bring in transparency related to various IPR.

One such recent approach has been to bring transparency in respect of Geographical Indication (GI) Registrations. DIPP published the details of GI Applications on 19th Dec 2014.

GI- Registration trends in India 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Surgical Devices – Patenting trends in India

Surgical Devices -  Patenting trends in India

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment



Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Patenting Probiotics: Trends in India

Probiotics patenting trends in IndiaProbiotics are live microorganisms which when administered in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host[1]. The digestive system is home to more than 500 different types of bacteria[2]. Probiotics have been shown to have beneficial effects against various diseases and disorders.

Probiotic food Products in India are generally available as milk and fermented milk products. Examples of  companies selling probiotics products in India include: Probiotic icecream, Yogurt, Probiotic lassi  by Amul; b-Activ Probiotic Dahi, b-Activ Probiotic Lassi, b- Activ Curd and Nutrifit (Strawberry and Mango) by Mother Dairy; Yakult by Danone; NESVITA probiotic curd by Nestle.

Probiotics drugs available in Indian market includes but are not limited to those manufactured by companies like Ranbaxy (Binifit), Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories( Becelac-PB, Becelac-PL, Becelac forte), Zydus, Cadila, Unichem(Vizyl), JB Chem(Gutpro), and Glaxo SmithKline(Stibs).

A recent survey of the probiotic market in India indicated that probiotic yogurt sale is expected to cross 100,000 Thousand packets by 2015. Amul is the leader in Probiotic yogurt sales in India and is likely to remain as a leader in the years to come. Probiotic drink sales volume is likely to reach a little less than 100,000 Thousand bottles by the year 2015. In probiotic drink sales volume, Yakult is way ahead than Mother Dairy.[3]

To know the trends in patent filing in India in the field of probiotics, a detailed search was performed at the official website for the granted patents and the published applications. Attached herewith is the summary of the trends observed.






Posted in General | Leave a comment

Patent and Trademark prosecution trends-2013

Prosecution_Trends_INDIA 2013India Patent and Trademark Office IPTO has been bringing about lots of changes and reforms both at Organisational level and functional level. At the Organisational level there has been uptake in personnel for prosecuting Applications filed before the IPTO. Efforts have been put to increase transparency in dealing with the applications. At the functional level, there have been a number of reforms focused on improving the manner in which the IPTO prosecutes Patent and Trademark Applications through publication of guidelines for preparing and prosecuting Patent applications related to specific areas of technology. There has also been publication categorising Patent applications/Grants based on certain areas of technology. IN 2013, IPTO along IPAB became the focus of International IP news owing to decisions revoking certain Patent Grants and granting/refusing compulsory licences in respect of certain other granted Patents, specifically in the field of Pharma.
The current presentation is a first in the series of presentations to be posted to discuss and study prosecution trends in Patent and Trademark matters before IPTO and IPAB

Posted in General | Leave a comment

Patent Law – Indian or Alien?!!

Nirupama Rao, the Indian Ambassador to US in a letter to the Senate India caucus  has expressed willingness to discuss Patent policy in the interest of bi-lateral relations. The contents of the letter as available can be accessed here.  Also in the letter, the Ambassador has spoken high of the Indian Patent Law stating that “India has a well-settled, stable and robust intellectual property regime. The three main pillars of this regime are comprehensive laws, detailed rules to back them up, and strong enforcement mechanisms, including for dispute resolution. In India, the IP framework is rooted in law.”  The Ambassador also points out that the IP Laws, as in force, are fully compliant with the TRIPS. One object of concern in this letter is if India has evolved and is in compliance with International guideline, does discuss ‘Patent policy’ mean succumbing to lobby pressure to amend the Law, yet again?? If so, where are we headed??

Patent Law in India as it stands today, is more of a compliant Law rather than an evolved Law. Specificially after India embraced the Globalisation model, the amendments that have come, have been to bring compliancy. We had presented this view of evolution of India Patent Law here. This, in a crude sense, can be regarded as Evolution, if one needs to attribute it so. Every major amendment to a Patent Law in any other regime has been due to a case law decided. The case law could be pertaining to a procedure of Examination, Infringement or the Patent Law itself. In India, currently the focus is on filing Patent Applications and obtaining a Grant. The rules and procedure of Grant are also in the process of getting normalised across the various Offices. Although the number of Pre-Grant and Post Grant Oppositions have been on the rise, the decisions of these are yet to have a binding precedence on the procedure for examination and subsequent Grant of Patent. 

A Patent Grant is strictly territorial.  The Rights of a Patentee is enforceable only within the territories of India. Having said that, the Grant of a Patent cannot be in contravention to Laws existing within the territories of India. A US Trade Report termed as 301 Report published recently states “….. For example, a patent system much encourage the development of inventions that meet the well established international criteria of being new, involving an inventive step and being capable of industrial application” .  If the phrase ‘international criteria’ referred to, in the report, is  TRIPS, then India is already there well within the framework suggested (Art.62 para 4 under Part-IV of TRIPS read along with Art.41 paras 2 and 3 under Part-III of TRIPS). These articles have been debated enough and interpreted as well. The object of this discussion is not to revisit these arguments but to reassertain the fact that any Law is robust only when it evolves itself as an outcome of amendments primarily through case law and subsequently through international commitments.

The US Patent Regime, for example, through its Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), the Supreme Court and USPTO has raised several questions relating to Patentable Subject Matter. Be it, in falling short of rejecting business methods through Bilski, the very recent rejection of Gene patent for a breast cancer gene or the numerous decisions on granting Patents to ‘frivolous’ Patents, the regime has been evolving.Patent litigations are still in infancy. There is a need for such cases to be filed and orders to be passed that leads to evolution of Patent Law in India.

A Law, territorial in its existence has to evolve within its territory primarily and adapt to the socio-economic conditions existing in the territory. A Law enacted cannot be isolated from other Laws existing in the territory and particularly in tune with the articles of the Constitution of the Land. In India, the Constitution declares India to be a sovereign, socialist, secular, democratic republic, assuring its citizens of justice, equality, and liberty. Any Law enacted within India cannot contravene any of these commitment and IPR Laws are not immune to this commitment as well.

It is in this regard, that Patent Law in India, which has been amended the most number of times, only to make it compliant with ‘international standards’  should be allowed to evolve on its own and amend it’s Law based on the case laws. All stake holders should participate actively to ensure that there is an evolution and not revolution. Evolution is a sustainable model and revolution should act only as a precursor to the evolution.

Posted in General | Leave a comment

A Talk by Intellocopia Founder at Global IP Convention 2013

Intellocopia IP Services participated in the Global IP Convention 2013, held in Bangalore during Jan 23-30, 2013. Narendra Bhatta HL, Founder & CEO presented a talk on “Indian Patentology: A Saga of Evolution,Compliance & Harmonisation”.

Narendra Bhatta’s Speaker Profile

[slideshare id=16373868&w=427&h=356&sc=no]

Posted in General | 1 Comment

What is an Invention?

On Invention

An invention is a new product or process, that has a feature not obvious to a person skilled in the art and is capable of commercial exploitation. In simple language, for a product to be considered as an invention, the following should be met

1.  problem statement; and 2. a solution to the problem identified.

The problem, as stated should not be an exclusive or an one-off problem. The problem should be perceived and experienced by people of the industry, to which the problem is related. The problem need not always be exotic. One such simple problem is stated herein to demonstrate how inventions can be  ‘simple’ and yet make profound difference.

How many a time have we tried to pour, squeeze, apply ketchup onto a plate /on a toasted bread / along with our favourite evening snack and faced problems like shaking the bottle, hard squeezing and struggling to get just the quantity we need???. If this is the problem then the following link demonstrates how the technology has helped in overcoming this problem. The link also demonstrates the commercial exploitation potential of the technology.

Think different and Think at places not normally probed…. Unleash the power of intellect..

Posted in Invention | Tagged | Leave a comment

wishes for an IP Active year ahead

wishes for an IP Active year ahead

Posted in General | Leave a comment